Printable Clinical Reference

CLTC-ID — One-Page Clinical Summary

CLTC (17q23.1) · Clathrin Heavy Chain · Autosomal dominant, de novo · Prepared from published case series (n ≈ 75) and ClinVar / gnomAD data. For case conferences and referral letters; not a substitute for specialist interpretation.

1 · Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Clinical FeatureOverall Prevalence†Missense Variants (n≈45)Truncating Variants (n≈30)
Intellectual Disability~100%Mild to Severe (variable)Typically Mild to Moderate
Speech / Language Delay~100%Universal; often severeUniversal; variable severity
Developmental / Motor Delay~90%Significant hypotonia and delayMild to moderate hypotonia
Epilepsy / Seizures~60%~80% of missense cases; early onset~20% of truncating cases; later onset
Behavioral Features~60%Autistic traits, stereotypiesADHD, specific learning disorders
Microcephaly~50%More common (~50% of missense)Less common; seen in subset
Feeding Difficulties~40%Particularly during infancyVariable; less frequently reported

† Prevalence estimates from published CLTC case series and registries (aggregated cohort n ≈ 75).[1][2]

2 · Prevalence Estimates (Three Methods)

MethodEstimated RateInterpretation
ClinVar (Method 1)1 in 424,000Diagnosed floor — US clinical submissions only
gnomAD Constraint (Method 2)~1 in 35,000Biological estimate ★ — gene constraint model, independent of diagnosis rate
Fermi Estimation (Method 3)~1 in 38,000Independent cross-check — de novo mutation rate × penetrance

Sources: ClinVar (ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar); gnomAD v2.1[3] — Karczewski KJ et al. Nature. 2020;581:434–443; de novo rate methodology — McRae JF et al. Nature. 2017;542:433–438.[4]

3 · Variant Classification & Molecular Mechanism

TypeMolecular consequenceSeverity tendencyMechanism~% ClinVar
MissenseAmino-acid substitution; protein produced but misfoldedTypically most severeDominant-negative~45%
NonsensePremature stop codon; truncated fragment degradedLoss-of-function (milder)Haploinsufficiency~18%
FrameshiftReading-frame shift → premature stopLoss-of-function (milder)Haploinsufficiency~16%
Splice-siteDisrupts exon–intron boundary; exon skipping / intron retentionLoss-of-function (milder)Haploinsufficiency~13%
SilentSynonymous change; protein identical (rarely disrupts splicing)Generally minimalVariable~8%

ClinVar percentages are approximate, based on pathogenic/likely pathogenic CLTC submissions (accessed 2026).[1]

Dominant-negative vs haploinsufficiency

Missense variants produce a structurally altered clathrin heavy chain that poisons the triskelion network (dominant-negative effect), explaining the more severe phenotype compared with truncating variants, which simply halve functional clathrin supply (haploinsufficiency).[1]

Diagnostic gap

Published literature documents ~31 cases; ClinVar holds ~199 effective pathogenic variants; gnomAD and Fermi estimates converge on ~1 in 35,00038,000 live births — comparable to STXBP1 and SCN1A-related Dravet syndrome. Most CLTC-ID individuals worldwide remain undiagnosed.[3]

gnomAD constraint (CLTC)

pLI = 1.00 · LOEUF = 0.12 · o/e missense = 0.73. The near-zero LOEUF confirms extreme intolerance to loss-of-function variants — among the strongest constraint scores in the genome.[3]

Inheritance & recurrence

Virtually all reported cases are de novo autosomal dominant. Parental gonadal mosaicism is possible; empiric recurrence risk for unaffected parents is low (<1%) but non-zero. Germline testing of parents is recommended.[1][2]

5 · Clinical Screening Priorities

AreaWatch forRecommended action
Brain developmentMicrocephaly, corpus callosum hypoplasia, cortical malformationsSerial OFC and brain MRI at diagnosis or when growth deviates.
Epilepsy / EEGFocal or generalised seizures; especially missense variants or onset before age 2Baseline EEG; repeat with any paroxysmal event or developmental regression.
Kidney structureHyperechogenic kidneys, agenesis, vesicoureteral refluxRenal ultrasound at diagnosis; nephrology referral if anomalies present.
Newborn signsHypotonia ('floppy baby'), inguinal or umbilical herniaDocument tone exam; surgical referral for hernias; early-intervention referral.
Feeding / growthPoor suck, slow weight gain, intrauterine or postnatal growth restrictionGrowth chart tracking; SLP or feeding-team review; GI if persistent.

[1][2]

Prenatal ultrasound red flags

  • Hypoplastic or absent corpus callosum

    Best assessed on dedicated mid-sagittal views; correlate with biparietal diameter.

  • Ventriculomegaly

    Atrial width ≥10 mm warrants follow-up imaging and consideration of single-gene causes.

  • Microcephaly / small biparietal diameter

    Plot serial biometry; flag persistent <3rd centile for genetic review.

  • Cerebellar or posterior fossa anomalies

    Assess vermis, cisterna magna, and brainstem on axial and sagittal planes.

  • Intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR)

    Consider when paired with CNS findings rather than as an isolated sign.

When these findings cluster on a high-resolution second-trimester scan and a single-gene cause is plausible, offer trio whole-exome sequencing or a fetal neurodevelopmental disorder panel that includes CLTC.[5]

Adult-onset parkinsonism flag

A small but documented late-teens / early-twenties onset of bradykinesia, rigidity, and asymmetric tremor has been reported in adult CLTC carriers. Long-term follow-up should include a brief movement-disorder review. Treatment guidance is out of scope here.[6][7]

Recurrence-risk counseling

Most CLTC variants arise de novo; sibling recurrence is very low but not zero due to parental germline mosaicism. Test both parents for the proband’s variant using deep-coverage NGS (not Sanger alone) before counseling future pregnancies.[8]

Recommended diagnostic test

Trio whole-exome sequencing (or a large ID/epilepsy gene panel explicitly including CLTC) is highest-yield first-line. CMA is typically negative (single nucleotide variants / small indels). Confirm candidate variants by Sanger and report in HGVS on canonical transcript NM_004859.[1][2]

7 · Variant Database Lookup (CLTC)

ClinVar

Clinical significance, ACMG classification, and submitter evidence for reported CLTC variants.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/?term=CLTC%5BGene%5D

gnomAD

Population allele frequency, constraint metrics (pLI, LOEUF), and observed-vs-expected variant counts.

https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/gene/ENSG00000141367

Decipher

Clinical information, phenotype data, and developmental-disorder context curated for CLTC.

https://www.deciphergenomics.org/gene/CLTC/overview/clinical-info

This summary is an educational reference derived from published CLTC case series, ClinVar, and gnomAD. Individual presentations vary significantly. It is not a substitute for advice from a clinical geneticist or specialist. Source pages: cltc-portal /clinician · /incidence.

References

  1. 1.

    Nabais Sá MJ, de Man SA, et al. De novo CLTC variants are associated with a variable phenotype from mild to severe intellectual disability, microcephaly, hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, and epilepsy. Genet Med. 2020;22(4):797–802.

  2. 2.

    DeMari J, Mroske C, et al. CLTC as a clinically novel gene associated with multiple malformations and developmental delay. Am J Med Genet A. 2016;170(4):958–966.

  3. 3.

    Karczewski KJ, Francioli LC, et al. The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans. Nature. 2020;581(7809):434–443. (gnomAD v2.1 CLTC gene constraint scores: pLI = 1.00, LOEUF = 0.12.) gnomAD Browser: gnomad.broadinstitute.org/gene/ENSG00000141367

  4. 4.

    McRae JF, Clayton S, Fitzgerald TW, et al. (Deciphering Developmental Disorders Study). Prevalence and architecture of de novo mutations in developmental disorders. Nature. 2017;542(7642):433–438. (Methodological basis for de novo mutation rate estimation used in the Fermi incidence model.)

  5. 5.

    Shen Y, et al. A novel de novo CLTC variant altering RNA splicing causes fetal developmental abnormalities. BMC Med Genomics. 2023;16:341. (Supports prenatal ultrasound red-flag findings and recommendation for trio WES or ID/epilepsy panel.)

  6. 6.

    Nardecchia F, et al. Improvement of movement disorder and neurodevelopment under selegiline in a CLTC-deficient patient. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2023 Sep;10(9):1430–1432.

  7. 7.

    Usnich T, et al. Correspondence on levodopa response in CLTC-related parkinsonism. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2024.

  8. 8.

    Sveistrup & Myers, et al. Mosaic CLTC pathogenic variant causing focal epilepsy with normal intelligence. Epileptic Disord. 2024 Dec;26(6):875.